Design Systems Decoded: Tailoring the Perfect Fit for Small Teams and Startups

Design systems are crucial in the tech industry, particularly for small teams and startups. They serve as the backbone of product design, influencing how a product is perceived and experienced by users. For teams with limited resources, the decision between adopting an off-the-shelf design system or developing a custom solution is vital. 

From the many, many projects that DiUS has done, I have found that delaying this choice can lead to significant challenges down the road, impacting the product’s development speed, scalability, and overall user experience.

When I join a new startup client or a team with limited resources, I always feel a sense of excitement and relief when I discover they’ve had thoughtful discussions about their design system needs. It’s not just about having a system in place; it’s about understanding its role and constraints. Seeing a team that has carefully considered whether to adopt an existing system or craft their own solution tells me they’re setting themselves up for success. It shows that design isn’t an afterthought, but a core part of their product strategy from the outset. 

The Appeal of Off-the-Shelf Design Systems

An off-the-shelf design system presents an attractive option – it offers a plug-and-play solution that can dramatically speed up the design process. These systems come with a set of predefined components, templates, and guidelines, allowing teams to focus more on product development or other design issues rather than on designing each element from scratch. I’ve seen more and more design systems arrive each year, which speaks to the growing popularity of these solutions.

Off-the-shelf systems provide a foundation for consistency in design, which is crucial for building a coherent user experience. This consistency is beneficial for the end-users but also streamlines the work process for developers and designers. With a common language and set of rules in place, teams can avoid the pitfalls of misaligned designs and ensure that their product maintains a professional and cohesive look.

I have also found off-the-shelf can be a great option for very early-stage startups that need to move fast and often lack a complete understanding of their customers’ needs. They serve as a significant step up from clickable prototypes, allowing startups to quickly put a functioning product in customers’ hands. This approach enables gathering real user insights and helps validate product-market fit before investing in a more bespoke solution. By using an off-the-shelf system, startups can accelerate their journey from concept to market, gaining valuable feedback and understanding along the way. It’s a pragmatic choice that balances speed, functionality, and the need for user validation in those critical early stages of product development.

However, while these systems offer speed and efficiency, they are not without their limitations. As we explore further, it’s important to understand that the ease of initial setup with off-the-shelf systems might come with trade-offs, especially when custom requirements arise.

Limitations and Challenges of Off-the-Shelf Design Systems

Off-the-shelf design systems offer quick start benefits, but they come with inherent challenges, particularly for projects with unique visions. One of the primary limitations is the potential mismatch between the system’s offerings and the specific needs of a product. These systems, while comprehensive, are often generic. They may not align perfectly with the unique branding or functional requirements of a product, leading to a situation where the design feels ‘almost right’ but not quite tailored. There is no perfect universal solution.

Another significant challenge is scalability and adaptability. As the product evolves, the initial design system may struggle to accommodate new features or changes that stray from its core components. This can lead to a disjointed user experience as new, custom elements begin to look and feel different from the initial set. Additionally, the more a team customises the off-the-shelf system, the more they drift away from its updates and support, potentially leading to maintenance challenges in the long run. I’ve found the more you push against an off-the-shelf system, the harder it is to work with. It’s best to accept that acceleration comes at the cost of customisation and the more you customise, the more you break.

Long-term reliance on an external system can create a dependency that might not be sustainable as the product grows. Teams need to be agile, and being tied to a system that doesn’t evolve at the same pace as their product can hinder progress.

Understanding these limitations is crucial for startups to make an informed decision. The appeal of speed and efficiency needs to be weighed against the potential future costs of adapting a system that may not grow with their product. And in my experience, examining the components, flexibility and performance of different off-the-shelf solutions can be a very time-intensive process.

Custom Design Systems: A Scalable Alternative?

For startups and small teams, particularly those with only one or two designers focused primarily on new product features, creating a custom design system may seem daunting. However, this approach can offer scalability and a tailor-made solution that grows with the product.

I’ve found the main advantage of a custom design system is its flexibility – allowing teams to craft a design language that aligns perfectly with their brand identity and user experience goals. This bespoke approach means every element, from typography to color schemes, can be designed to reflect the unique qualities of the product and brand. Which is really important when you’re trying to stand out in a crowded market or cater to a specific niche audience. Custom design systems also allow for easier iterations and updates as the product evolves, ensuring that the design remains consistent yet adaptable to changing user needs and business objectives. Moreover, it can be a valuable asset in building a strong, recognizable brand identity that resonates with users and sets the product apart from competitors. While it requires more upfront investment in time and resources, a well-crafted custom design system can pay dividends in the long run by streamlining the design process, reducing decision fatigue, and creating a cohesive user experience across all touchpoints.

However, the challenge lies in the resources required. Building a design system from the ground up demands time, design expertise, and often, a level of foresight that can be challenging for a small team or a rapidly evolving startup. The development of a custom system can divert valuable resources away from product development, which is a crucial consideration for any startup operating with limited resources.

Maintaining and updating a custom design system as the product evolves is a continuous task. Without a dedicated design team, this responsibility often falls on the few available designers or even the developers, which can lead to inconsistencies and technical debt over time.

Therefore, while a custom design system offers the advantage of full control and alignment with the product’s vision, it also requires a significant investment in terms of time and effort. This investment needs to be weighed against the immediate needs and long-term strategy of the startup.

Balancing Act: Merging Off-the-Shelf with Custom Solutions

Startups often find a middle ground by cherry-picking elements from off-the-shelf design systems to supplement or lay the foundation for their custom solutions. This hybrid approach can offer the best of both worlds, leveraging the efficiency of pre-made components while maintaining the uniqueness of a custom design.

At DiUS, we’ve found the key to successfully integrating off-the-shelf elements into a custom design system is in selective adoption. Startups can adopt widely-recognised components and patterns that users are familiar with, such as buttons, icons, and navigation elements, from off-the-shelf systems. This provides a base level of user experience consistency and speeds up the initial design process.

On top of this foundation startups can build custom components that require unique branding or specific functionalities not covered by off-the-shelf solutions. This could involve tailoring visual elements like color palettes, typography, and imagery to fit the brand’s identity, or developing unique UI components that differentiate the product in the market.

In my experience, this approach requires careful planning and a clear understanding of the design system’s goals. Ensuring that the integration of off-the-shelf and custom elements doesn’t lead to a disjointed user experience. Consistency in design principles and attention to detail is key in making sure that the final product feels cohesive.

For small teams, particularly those with limited design resources, this approach allows for the creation of a semi-custom design system without the overwhelming commitment of building everything from scratch. It provides a practical pathway to evolve the design system in tandem with the product, making it a scalable and flexible solution.

Navigating Design System Choices

For small teams and startups, choosing the right design system is a crucial decision that impacts not just the current project but also future scalability and user experience. Whether to opt for an off-the-shelf solution, invest in a custom system, or adopt a hybrid approach depends on several factors including team size, project scope, available resources, and long-term business goals.

When evaluating off-the-shelf systems, consider the extent to which their components align with your product’s needs. It’s essential to assess the flexibility these systems offer in terms of customization and how well they can adapt to your evolving requirements.

If considering a custom design system, weigh the resource investment required against the unique value it could bring to your product. A fully custom system might offer a perfect brand alignment but requires a substantial commitment in terms of time and expertise.

For many, a hybrid approach, combining the speed and familiarity of off-the-shelf components with the unique branding of custom elements, can be a practical solution. This approach allows for the creation of a tailored user experience while maintaining efficiency in the design process.

The key takeaway here is that your choice of design system should be rooted in a deep understanding of both your business requirements and user expectations. It’s not a one-and-done decision; regular evaluations and updates are crucial to keep your design system aligned with your evolving product and team dynamics. The primary objective is twofold: firstly, to craft a cohesive and compelling user experience that connects with your audience and propels your business goals forward. Secondly, to harness the power of reusable components and code, unlocking greater speed and efficiency in your development process. This balanced approach ensures that your design system isn’t just a visual framework, but a strategic asset that drives product success and team productivity.

For small teams and startups, choosing the right design system is a crucial decision that impacts not just the current project but also future scalability and user experience. Whether to opt for an off-the-shelf solution, invest in a custom system, or adopt a hybrid approach depends on several factors including team size, project scope, available resources, and long-term business goals.

When evaluating off-the-shelf systems, consider the extent to which their components align with your product’s needs. It’s essential to assess the flexibility these systems offer in terms of customization and how well they can adapt to your evolving requirements.

If considering a custom design system, weigh the resource investment required against the unique value it could bring to your product. A fully custom system might offer a perfect brand alignment but requires a substantial commitment in terms of time and expertise.

For many, a hybrid approach, combining the speed and familiarity of off-the-shelf components with the unique branding of custom elements, can be a practical solution. This approach allows for the creation of a tailored user experience while maintaining efficiency in the design process.

The key takeaway here is that your choice of design system should be rooted in a deep understanding of both your business requirements and user expectations. It’s not a one-and-done decision; regular evaluations and updates are crucial to keep your design system aligned with your evolving product and team dynamics. The primary objective is twofold: firstly, to craft a cohesive and compelling user experience that connects with your audience and propels your business goals forward. Secondly, to harness the power of reusable components and code, unlocking greater speed and efficiency in your development process. This balanced approach ensures that your design system isn’t just a visual framework, but a strategic asset that drives product success and team productivity.

Want to know more about how DiUS can help you?

Offices

Melbourne
Level 3, 31 Queen St Melbourne, Victoria, 3000

Phone: 03 9008 5400

Sydney
The Commons

32 York St Sydney,

New South Wales, 2000

DiUS wishes to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the lands on which we work and gather at both our Melbourne and Sydney offices. We pay respect to Elders past, present and emerging and celebrate the diversity of Aboriginal peoples and their ongoing cultures and connections to the lands and waters of Australia.

Subscribe to updates from DiUS

Sign up to receive the latest news, insights and event invites from DiUS straight into your inbox.

© 2024 DiUS®. All rights reserved.

Privacy  |  Terms